Logo

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

13.06.2025 00:29

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

PC: Google

Which album is your favorite that's now 50 years old (from 1975), and what's the best song on the album?

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

Because reading is WORK. Period.

Have the ability to visualize:

Have you ever been physically attacked by a demon?

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

PC: Google

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

Do you have any opinion on Japanese writer/actor Yukio Mishima?

Actually have some literary skill:

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

Witness testifies that Diddy dangled her over a balcony - BBC

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

Entertainment.

PC: Google

Do you have any attributes quirks sensitivities abilities etc that you've come to learn most people don't experience? E.g. dream with subtext or experience de ja vu regularly or know you experience life very differently from those around you etc?

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

Do most narcissists have good intentions as long as you are under their control?

Many if not most, are in this category.

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

Do you think that drug addiction is a symptom of larger societal ills? What is it about our culture that leaves so many feeling like they're inadequate, trying any ill to find a cure?

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

Kelp forest collapse alters food web and energy dynamics in the Gulf of Maine - Phys.org

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

Geopolitics Just Slapped the Oil Market Awake - Crude Oil Prices Today | OilPrice.com

Netflix and chill is a thing:

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

Jennifer Garner reveals her secrets to being 53, flirty, and thriving in candid interview - New York Post

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

Chevy’s C8 Corvette ZR1 Supercar Is Even Faster Than It Expected - Robb Report

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

Why don’t people want the American Dream anymore - marriage, kids, a dog, and the white picket fence?

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

PC: The Guardian

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

There are some books that just…suck!

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

PC: Google…my precious!

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

PC: Google

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly: